Case Study: When a “Company Certificate” Is Not Just One Document
The request looked standard at first –
confirmation of company registration for income verification on the Bybit exchange.
The client immediately specified the jurisdiction – Seychelles.
In practice, however, the case turned out to be more complex than “just one certificate”.
▪ What the platform actually requested
Not a formal document “for the record”,
but a set of corporate confirmations:
→ Certificate of Incorporation
→ a document confirming directors and signing authority
→ matching registration numbers, dates, and addresses
→ logic fully aligned with Bybit KYC requirements
▪ Where such cases most often fail
→ company registration number confused with tax ID
→ registration date and issuance date not synchronized
→ format ignored – scan ≠ screenshot
→ director listed in a separate register not taken into account
→ document logic broken by ad-hoc edits
▪ How we handled the case
We worked from the original Seychelles registry,
built a correct document structure,
verified date logic, director section, and share capital,
and aligned the format with what checkers expect
specifically for income verification on the exchange.
▪ Key takeaway
Corporate checks are not rejected because of visuals.
They fail due to registry logic, structure, and format compliance.
▸ If an exchange asks for “one more document”
without explaining what is wrong – write to us.
We’ll break the case down before the next submission.
› TG (backup): @diamond_otrisovka_new ( https:// t.me/ diamond_otrisovka_new )
› Telegram BOT: @diamond_otrisovka_bot ( https:// t.me/ diamond_otrisovka_bot )
› Info channel: Diamond Service ( https:// t.me/ +3CCfNlBVcEo3Zjcy )
※ PerfectumSupport publishes news and updates. Messages are not read; orders are accepted only via the contacts above.
#verification #documents #corporate #case #rendering #Bybit